Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles Egwuh's avatar

Great article right here!

My POV: I think this audacious step would have been more grandeur if:

1. The author of the mail had started by introducing the problem which their solution aim to tackle.

2. There was no proper introduction of the authors initiative, the goal of the project (why was painting an old classroom block necessary? Why should the organisation support in buying books for a library) except if otherwise stated in another addendum attached to the mail.

3. Like the author of the article said, visiting the websites of these companies might help to know about their CSR policies. But the "if" in the mail for me signifies that the author of the mail is not sure if they are communicating with the right organisation or not. Maybe a statement "telling how your project truly aligns with the organisation's mission of xxx would have helped . " if not then alternately...

4. Try convince the client about the benefits they will get from supporting or sponsoring your program, so that way its a win win situation for both parties.

In general, I think the author didn't really engage neither were they persuasive in selling their cause to their prospective partners.

What do you think? This is just my own view. But in general thanks for this great content, I learnt more about companys' CSR.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts